<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Uneasy Rhetoric &#187; GTD</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.uneasyrhetoric.net/tag/gtd/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.uneasyrhetoric.net</link>
	<description>When stream of consciousness meets a waterfall.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 11:45:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Mind like water.</title>
		<link>http://www.uneasyrhetoric.net/2006/02/04/mind-like-water/</link>
		<comments>http://www.uneasyrhetoric.net/2006/02/04/mind-like-water/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2006 15:56:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Uneasy Rhetoric</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[GTD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uneasyrhetoric.net/2006/02/04/mind-like-water/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Merlin Mann posts a tid-bit about someone who had an &#8220;a-ha&#8221; moment regarding the Getting Things Done &#8220;system.&#8221; That person&#8217;s epiphany also happens to reflect why I prefer GTD to Covey and the Franklin system: The best summary is on page 19 [of the book]: “The real issue is how to make appropriate choices about [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Merlin Mann <a href="http://www.43folders.com/2006/02/03/mark-f-on-gtd/">posts</a> a tid-bit about someone who had an &#8220;a-ha&#8221; moment regarding the <a href="http://www.powells.com/biblio/1-0142000280-9">Getting Things Done</a> &#8220;system.&#8221;  <a href="http://www.madprofessor.net/2006/02/getting_things_done.html">That person&#8217;s epiphany</a> also happens to reflect why I prefer GTD to Covey and the <a href="http://www.franklincovey.com/">Franklin</a> system:</p>
<blockquote><p>
The best summary is on page 19 [of the book]: “The real issue is how to make appropriate choices about what to do at any point in time. The real issue is how we manage actions.”</p></blockquote>
<p>A commenter to Mann&#8217;s post also suggests:</p>
<blockquote><p>GTD is about clearing my mind and reducing my anxiety until I can actually think about whatever’s actually in front of me.</p></blockquote>
<p>I want to be able to get a handle on all of life&#8217;s little projects and achieve Allen&#8217;s &#8220;mind like water&#8221; state so that I have the headspace for bigger issues.</p>
<p>I always found Covey&#8217;s system a little too rigid, and a little too focused on the big picture.  But reading this comment to Merlin&#8217;s post makes me wonder if maybe I should go back to Covey and see if there are elements of <a href="http://www.powells.com/biblio/2-0671708635-38">Seven Habits</a> I can adapt to GTD:</p>
<blockquote><p>
I shied away from full-monty GTD after a change in projects at work. The stark reality of what I had to do, and the fact that it didn’t get me anywhere near The Big Nouns, was causing more anxiety. [...] In the long run, it’s probably better to keep yourself aware of the deviation between your necessary next actions and your goals. When the right thing comes along you will recognize it.</p></blockquote>
<p>The truth is, I&#8217;m a long way from internalizing any organizational system, but GTD was the first organizational book I&#8217;d read where I really felt excited about the possibility of getting my discombobulated self in order.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.uneasyrhetoric.net/2006/02/04/mind-like-water/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Organization Fetish</title>
		<link>http://www.uneasyrhetoric.net/2005/01/18/organization-fetish/</link>
		<comments>http://www.uneasyrhetoric.net/2005/01/18/organization-fetish/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2005 06:38:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Uneasy Rhetoric</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[_general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GTD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uneasyrhetoric.net/2005/01/18/organization-fetish/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the cool things about getting big into the blogosphere is discovering that there are thousands of people out there, like me, with an organization fetish &#8211; people who have stepped over the edge of being hyper organized and into the realm where they spend more time fretting about their &#8220;system&#8221; than they do [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the cool things about getting big into the blogosphere is discovering that there are thousands of people out there, like me, with an organization fetish &#8211; people who have stepped over the edge of being hyper organized and into the realm where they spend more time fretting about their &#8220;system&#8221; than they do about the things the system is supposed to track.</p>
<p>Although it is somewhat Mac-centric (that isn&#8217;t a fault), <a href="http://www.43folders.com/">43Folders</a> was the first (that I found), and I would argue  one of the best, organization fetish sites around.  43Folders is big into the <a href="http://www.davidco.com/">Getting Things Done</a> system, which is the first organizing system that really clicked for me, although I will admit to being a lazy implementer.</p>
<p>There are many, many, more sites that feed this fetish.  For example, <a href="http://www.journalisimo.com/">Journalisimo</a> seeks to &#8220;invite a return to analog,&#8221; because sometimes pen and paper is just the way to go.  That is the reason I carry around a <a href="http://www.moleskinerie.com/">Moleskine</a>, although I don&#8217;t use it nearly as much as I should, and that is the reason I am always a little ambivalent about my Handspring Visor.  Yes it is great, and yes I can track so much more in digital form than on paper, but crossing off a to do is a factor of ten more satisfying on paper than it is on my PDA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.uneasyrhetoric.net/2005/01/18/organization-fetish/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

