[ View menu ]

 

July 29, 2008

Boards should be representin’

Tags: , , ,

RT Rider has a terrific post up about how the Regional Transit Board of Directors doesn’t use transit. Specifically, RT Rider asked the members of the Board whether they used transit and received responses from five of the eleven members, mostly listing excuses for not using transit that, while valid, miss the point.

Why do they miss the point? Because Boards of Directors are supposed to support the organizations they direct. In the non-profit world, the Board of Directors is supposed to be a cheerleader for the organization, with members speaking on behalf of the organization, advocating for it, and raising money.  As I see it, this also means the Board must have an intimate understanding of the organization it directs and, in the case of Regional Transit, this means riding the bus.  Not just light rail either. Ride the bus. And it means standing up for transit in their respective chambers or, as RT rider put it, “take transit back to their ‘day’ jobs.”

But unlike a non-profit Board, RT’s Board is made up of elected officials, no doubt because RT’s charter insists that they be there. That means that, for each city council or county board of supervisors involved, somebody has to draw the short straw and serve.

If RT’s Boardmembers aren’t willing to experience the services RT provides, then perhaps they should step aside for others who do care.

Or maybe RT should consider a change to its charter. It might be time to include non-elected officials on the Board.  It might be time to include a few RT consumers on the Board or even *gasp* create an elected Board of Directors.

Share:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Furl
  • Ma.gnolia
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Spurl

2 Comments

  1. john says:

    At the time I wrote the email to the Regional Transit board, I suggested to The Sacramento Bee editorial board that it should join the effort to convince RT’s board of its responsibility to promote transit. I included the then-new editor, Melanie Sill. This is the response I received:

    Subject: RE: Proposed editorial campaign re transit
    Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 14:50:25 -0800
    From: “Sill, Melanie - Sacramento”
    To: “Hughes, John - Sacramento”
    Cc: “Terhaar, Joyce - Sacramento”,
    “Saltzman, Mort - Sacramento”,
    “Buchmann, Anna - Sacramento”,
    “Holwerk, David - Sacramento”

    John,

    I tried to send a reply from my Blackberry but it bounced back.

    I need to ask you to take down this post. It isn’t appropriate for any member of The Bee news or editorial staffs to mount personal crusades on issues we cover. Nor is it appropriate for individuals to write letters to elected officials advocating on any issue. In and out of the office, we represent The Bee, and independence from any cause or faction is one of our prime values. In that regard, it also is inappropriate for you to write to the editorial board enlisting its advocacy on any issue.

    I am copying this reply to Joyce, Mort and Anna. As soon as we can arrange it when everyone is back Tuesday, we will have the appropriate followup conversations.

    Thanks,
    Melanie

    cc: Joyce, Mort, Anna, David

    I’ve been waiting since I was laid off by The Bee for the opportunity to resurrect this topic. The meeting Monday provided it. It is still a topic worthy of The Sacramento Bee’s editorial board and everyone else interested in transit.

    July 30, 2008 @ 1:19 pm

  2. Explore SACRAMENTO .com says:

    Very interesting topic you’ve raised about the board not fully supporting RT. It’s unfortunate the apparent lack of support offered in Sill’s response. It’s at least something they should feel the need to investigate….

    July 31, 2008 @ 7:17 pm

RSS feed Comments

Write Comment

XHTML: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>