<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RT Surreality.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.uneasyrhetoric.net/2007/07/23/rt-surreality/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.uneasyrhetoric.net/2007/07/23/rt-surreality/</link>
	<description>Lost soul, lost road, lost words.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 23:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Melly53</title>
		<link>http://www.uneasyrhetoric.net/2007/07/23/rt-surreality/#comment-26110</link>
		<dc:creator>Melly53</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 21:09:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uneasyrhetoric.net/2007/07/23/rt-surreality/#comment-26110</guid>
		<description>yada yada yada...you read it.

You seem like an asshat to me.  Bug off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yada yada yada&#8230;you read it.</p>
<p>You seem like an asshat to me.  Bug off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Q. RT Driver</title>
		<link>http://www.uneasyrhetoric.net/2007/07/23/rt-surreality/#comment-26049</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Q. RT Driver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 12:22:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uneasyrhetoric.net/2007/07/23/rt-surreality/#comment-26049</guid>
		<description>Yes.

We read this drivel.  If I were holding true the publics feelings about Bus and Light Rail Drivers I would refer to Yada Yada Yada as an ill informed asshat.  

Simply put, the budget impasse in California snatches monies that are gravely needed to maintain current service (which most people think is terrible) as well as the dollars to expand service to areas that are not connected or are barely a blip on the screen in terms of public transportation options.

The Governor robbed Peter to pay Paul, and thats the bottom line.  I would love to drive my train to the Airport....but even at my youthful age I do not see that happening before I buck the kicket.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes.</p>
<p>We read this drivel.  If I were holding true the publics feelings about Bus and Light Rail Drivers I would refer to Yada Yada Yada as an ill informed asshat.  </p>
<p>Simply put, the budget impasse in California snatches monies that are gravely needed to maintain current service (which most people think is terrible) as well as the dollars to expand service to areas that are not connected or are barely a blip on the screen in terms of public transportation options.</p>
<p>The Governor robbed Peter to pay Paul, and thats the bottom line.  I would love to drive my train to the Airport&#8230;.but even at my youthful age I do not see that happening before I buck the kicket.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://www.uneasyrhetoric.net/2007/07/23/rt-surreality/#comment-26034</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 19:56:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uneasyrhetoric.net/2007/07/23/rt-surreality/#comment-26034</guid>
		<description>yada yada yada. What a boring comment. Do people actually read this drivel?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yada yada yada. What a boring comment. Do people actually read this drivel?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yada yada yada</title>
		<link>http://www.uneasyrhetoric.net/2007/07/23/rt-surreality/#comment-26032</link>
		<dc:creator>yada yada yada</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 19:36:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uneasyrhetoric.net/2007/07/23/rt-surreality/#comment-26032</guid>
		<description>What a boring blog.  Do people actually read this drivel?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a boring blog.  Do people actually read this drivel?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://www.uneasyrhetoric.net/2007/07/23/rt-surreality/#comment-25976</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 13:55:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uneasyrhetoric.net/2007/07/23/rt-surreality/#comment-25976</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;"It’s a Catch 22 really, because RT could also attract more riders by offering more service.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Enticing people with more service can't happen because that assumes a ready supply of funding for expansion. Our environmentalist governor has just worked a deal with our compliant environmentalist majority Democrats that significantly reduces transit funding. Clearly, existing transit riders will be lucky if current service levels are maintained.  There will be no new services with which to attract riders.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>&#8220;It’s a Catch 22 really, because RT could also attract more riders by offering more service.</p></blockquote>
<p>Enticing people with more service can&#8217;t happen because that assumes a ready supply of funding for expansion. Our environmentalist governor has just worked a deal with our compliant environmentalist majority Democrats that significantly reduces transit funding. Clearly, existing transit riders will be lucky if current service levels are maintained.  There will be no new services with which to attract riders.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uneasy Rhetoric</title>
		<link>http://www.uneasyrhetoric.net/2007/07/23/rt-surreality/#comment-25972</link>
		<dc:creator>Uneasy Rhetoric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 05:26:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uneasyrhetoric.net/2007/07/23/rt-surreality/#comment-25972</guid>
		<description>cole - why indeed.

John -- it's a Catch 22 really, because RT could also attract more riders by offering more service.  I'd be curious to see how many commuters would actually take advantage of that offer (not just got the pass but used it).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cole - why indeed.</p>
<p>John &#8212; it&#8217;s a Catch 22 really, because RT could also attract more riders by offering more service.  I&#8217;d be curious to see how many commuters would actually take advantage of that offer (not just got the pass but used it).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cole</title>
		<link>http://www.uneasyrhetoric.net/2007/07/23/rt-surreality/#comment-25971</link>
		<dc:creator>cole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:52:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uneasyrhetoric.net/2007/07/23/rt-surreality/#comment-25971</guid>
		<description>build the damn thing to the airport...

why SF/Baltimore/Atlanta yada yada have decent urban planning and Sac 's suck is beyond me...

oh, that's right, the genius Angelides gave us new urbanism TOD at his Laguna stucco slum, BUT WITHOUT the mass transit...figures</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>build the damn thing to the airport&#8230;</p>
<p>why SF/Baltimore/Atlanta yada yada have decent urban planning and Sac &#8217;s suck is beyond me&#8230;</p>
<p>oh, that&#8217;s right, the genius Angelides gave us new urbanism TOD at his Laguna stucco slum, BUT WITHOUT the mass transit&#8230;figures</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://www.uneasyrhetoric.net/2007/07/23/rt-surreality/#comment-25967</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 16:39:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uneasyrhetoric.net/2007/07/23/rt-surreality/#comment-25967</guid>
		<description>More people need to take advantage of what transit service there is, imperfect as it may be. Only with more riders will there be better service. More needs to be done to convince people, especially those who work downtown, to use transit.

Unfortunately, one person misses a bus because it is early and he tells his friends buses are unreliable and people who have never boarded a bus never do, feeling they are better off not bothering with the hassle.

More needs to be done to encourage people to give transit a try.

I would like to see more from RT in the way of promotional offers. For instance, in the last week of the month, give away that month's transit passes to people who want to try the system out. For that one week, all they have to do is show their pass to the driver just like any other monthly pass holder. They get to ride as much as they want. What's the cost to RT? The benefit is obvious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More people need to take advantage of what transit service there is, imperfect as it may be. Only with more riders will there be better service. More needs to be done to convince people, especially those who work downtown, to use transit.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, one person misses a bus because it is early and he tells his friends buses are unreliable and people who have never boarded a bus never do, feeling they are better off not bothering with the hassle.</p>
<p>More needs to be done to encourage people to give transit a try.</p>
<p>I would like to see more from RT in the way of promotional offers. For instance, in the last week of the month, give away that month&#8217;s transit passes to people who want to try the system out. For that one week, all they have to do is show their pass to the driver just like any other monthly pass holder. They get to ride as much as they want. What&#8217;s the cost to RT? The benefit is obvious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uneasy rhetoric</title>
		<link>http://www.uneasyrhetoric.net/2007/07/23/rt-surreality/#comment-25966</link>
		<dc:creator>uneasy rhetoric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 15:17:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uneasyrhetoric.net/2007/07/23/rt-surreality/#comment-25966</guid>
		<description>Oh, I'm just being snarky.  I could easily have walked the extra two blocks to the timing point (it was in midtown - the next stop after mine), but I only could have made that decision in hindsight.

Service is way too slim in most of the city, let alone the 'burbs.  Those of us who live close to downtown are really lucky.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I&#8217;m just being snarky.  I could easily have walked the extra two blocks to the timing point (it was in midtown - the next stop after mine), but I only could have made that decision in hindsight.</p>
<p>Service is way too slim in most of the city, let alone the &#8216;burbs.  Those of us who live close to downtown are really lucky.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://www.uneasyrhetoric.net/2007/07/23/rt-surreality/#comment-25965</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 06:36:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uneasyrhetoric.net/2007/07/23/rt-surreality/#comment-25965</guid>
		<description>In theory, the buses are required to stop at timing points if they are more than one minute ahead, or so a driver once explained to me. However, if the timing points are too far apart, the bus can get several minutes ahead, especially if it is late and there are few riders. 

The bus I take home from work routinely has to wait three minutes at the first timing point, which means the previous two or three stops we were more than two minutes ahead of schedule. (There are just three timing points in the 18-mile route.)

I am &lt;i&gt;assuming&lt;/i&gt; that the timing points are located at &lt;i&gt;important&lt;/i&gt; stops, important being places were the most riders can be expected. That's certainly the case on my regular route -- Kaiser Hospital, Wal-Mart, etc. 

There may be drivers who go out of their way to keep to the schedule between timing points, but that hasn't been my experience in the months I've been relying on RT to get to and from work. 

As for your potential half-hour wait, on too many of RT's suburban routes that wait can be more than an hour, especially after 6 p.m. And if the state funding gets significantly cut this year, as it appears it will, suburban riders will be lucky to have what little service they have today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In theory, the buses are required to stop at timing points if they are more than one minute ahead, or so a driver once explained to me. However, if the timing points are too far apart, the bus can get several minutes ahead, especially if it is late and there are few riders. </p>
<p>The bus I take home from work routinely has to wait three minutes at the first timing point, which means the previous two or three stops we were more than two minutes ahead of schedule. (There are just three timing points in the 18-mile route.)</p>
<p>I am <i>assuming</i> that the timing points are located at <i>important</i> stops, important being places were the most riders can be expected. That&#8217;s certainly the case on my regular route &#8212; Kaiser Hospital, Wal-Mart, etc. </p>
<p>There may be drivers who go out of their way to keep to the schedule between timing points, but that hasn&#8217;t been my experience in the months I&#8217;ve been relying on RT to get to and from work. </p>
<p>As for your potential half-hour wait, on too many of RT&#8217;s suburban routes that wait can be more than an hour, especially after 6 p.m. And if the state funding gets significantly cut this year, as it appears it will, suburban riders will be lucky to have what little service they have today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
